
Richard Burton, Geneviève Bujold, Anthony Quayle
4/5Plot Summary:
Adapted from Maxwell Anderson's popular play, 'Anne of the Thousand Days' is yet another retelling of the tragic love story between King Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn, but one which casts Anne the reluctant and often unwilling object of the King's affection...
She eventually succumbs to the Henry's advances (as well as to her own developing feelings towards him) only to find that the King's love is fickle and that her fate rests in her ability to produce a male heir.
***
Review:
To be honest, the first time I sat down to watch the film I didn't much care for it...In fact, I thought it was pretty awful.
The Anne Boleyn apologists are working overtime to portray her in a favourable light, making it clear that her relationship with the King was initiated and pursued by Henry alone --despite Anne's many earnest objections --thereby excusing her of most of the messiness of the English Reformation.
Overall the characters are a bit clichéd, the acting (as is typical of most historical films of this period) is overly heavy-handed and bombastic, and not surprisingly the history is suspect...
But by the end I really really liked it...and I don't know why.
The film is like watching a historical trainwreck: You can't look away!
Of course, it doesn't hurt that the sets and costumes are nice to look at, to say nothing of the lead actors themselves. Richard Burton and Geneviève Bujold have very good on-screen chemistry (even if their performances sometimes drift towards the melodramatic) and I thought Bujold was especially well suited to the role...portraying a very passionate and fiery Anne Boleyn. I was also quite impressed with John Colicos as the unscrupulous and opportunistic Thomas Cromwell.
All in all the film is well constructed, with a compelling narrative and very few (if any) dramatic lulls.
All in all the film is well constructed, with a compelling narrative and very few (if any) dramatic lulls.
However, I do have two major complaints, both of which occur during the final moments of the film...
While I can overlook most of the historical problems, 'Anne of the Thousand Days' is still guilty of one of my biggest 'Period-Movie Pet Peeves': Historical Clairvoyance! (acting and reacting in a way which suggests a foreknowledge of future events).
In order to justify her apparent martyrdom (as it is presented in the film), Anne gives a long and impassioned speech defying Henry and prophesying the glorious reign of Elizabeth as Queen of England...ultimately preferring to sacrifice her own life rather than let her daughter be declared a bastard.
The truth is Anne would have had absolutely no reason to believe that Elizabeth wouldn't be declared a bastard anyway (she was) or that Henry wouldn't re-marry and have a son (he did). Even at the time the chances of Elizabeth succeeding to the English throne would have seemed staggeringly slim. So this speech rather colours the end of the film and makes Anne's death seem a tad ridiculous and pointless, even in the context of the story.
Which brings me to the execution.
It boggles my mind that an execution as well documented as Anne Boleyn's should be presented in such a laughable and contrived way...with her staring down her executioner, who exclaims (in his best Pepé Le Pew French accent) "Mon Dieu, she looks at me!"
I laughed all through the credits.
(more's the pity, since until that point I was actually starting to tear up a little...)
So I guess the bottom line is that I really enjoyed watching this film...whether I enjoyed it in spite of its many problems or because of them is still up for debate.
Either way, I highly recommend it.
DVD Worthy: Certainly (though at the moment this film is only available in a two-pack with 'Mary Queen of Scots')
Extras: None
Costumes: A mixed bag. Some of the costume are extremely beautiful, but very few are remotely accurate. Not surprisingly most of the leads look very good in their elaborate coats and gowns, but I was largely underwhelmed with Henry's wardrobe and didn't think he cut a very imposing figure as King.
(certainly it was nothing to the lavish costumes worn 3 years later by Keith Michell in 'Henry VIII and his Six Wives' ).
Still, I liked almost all of Anne's dresses in the French style, if only because they were very pretty and were well suited to Geneviève Bujold slender figure.
The hairstyles and hoods were more problematic...
As in most Tudor films of the 1960s, the French hoods tend to be overly large and halo-like while sitting too far back on the head (the veils, when they do appear, are almost always attached incorrectly and made of inappropriate material). Anne also wears some very anachronistic hairstyles, including one which is very reminiscent of the famous Schönbrunn portrait of Empress Sissi (1865).
While I can overlook most of the historical problems, 'Anne of the Thousand Days' is still guilty of one of my biggest 'Period-Movie Pet Peeves': Historical Clairvoyance! (acting and reacting in a way which suggests a foreknowledge of future events).
In order to justify her apparent martyrdom (as it is presented in the film), Anne gives a long and impassioned speech defying Henry and prophesying the glorious reign of Elizabeth as Queen of England...ultimately preferring to sacrifice her own life rather than let her daughter be declared a bastard.
The truth is Anne would have had absolutely no reason to believe that Elizabeth wouldn't be declared a bastard anyway (she was) or that Henry wouldn't re-marry and have a son (he did). Even at the time the chances of Elizabeth succeeding to the English throne would have seemed staggeringly slim. So this speech rather colours the end of the film and makes Anne's death seem a tad ridiculous and pointless, even in the context of the story.
Which brings me to the execution.
It boggles my mind that an execution as well documented as Anne Boleyn's should be presented in such a laughable and contrived way...with her staring down her executioner, who exclaims (in his best Pepé Le Pew French accent) "Mon Dieu, she looks at me!"
I laughed all through the credits.
(more's the pity, since until that point I was actually starting to tear up a little...)
So I guess the bottom line is that I really enjoyed watching this film...whether I enjoyed it in spite of its many problems or because of them is still up for debate.
Either way, I highly recommend it.
***
DVD Worthy: Certainly (though at the moment this film is only available in a two-pack with 'Mary Queen of Scots')
Extras: None
***
Designer: Margaret Furse {Mary, Queen of Scots (1971), The Lion In Winter (1968)}
Era: England, 1523/1525-1536 C.E
Era: England, 1523/1525-1536 C.E
Costumes: A mixed bag. Some of the costume are extremely beautiful, but very few are remotely accurate. Not surprisingly most of the leads look very good in their elaborate coats and gowns, but I was largely underwhelmed with Henry's wardrobe and didn't think he cut a very imposing figure as King.
(certainly it was nothing to the lavish costumes worn 3 years later by Keith Michell in 'Henry VIII and his Six Wives' ).
Still, I liked almost all of Anne's dresses in the French style, if only because they were very pretty and were well suited to Geneviève Bujold slender figure.
The hairstyles and hoods were more problematic...
As in most Tudor films of the 1960s, the French hoods tend to be overly large and halo-like while sitting too far back on the head (the veils, when they do appear, are almost always attached incorrectly and made of inappropriate material). Anne also wears some very anachronistic hairstyles, including one which is very reminiscent of the famous Schönbrunn portrait of Empress Sissi (1865).
***




































***
Costumes In Detail
*Additional Screen-Captures & Production Photos*
Costumes In Detail
*Additional Screen-Captures & Production Photos*

Anne's White & Green Gown
Anne's Golden/Flax Gown
Anne's Lavender Riding Dress
Anne's Brown Gown
Anne's Blue Velvet Robe
Anne's White Masquerade Dress
Anne's Sapphire Blue Gown
Anne's Green Dress
Anne's Coronation Gown
Anne's White Gown With Black Embroidery
Anne's Grey/Taupe Gown
Anne's Brown 'Trial' Gown
Anne's Execution Gown

11 comments:
This film is also available standalone on DVD:
here
Though maybe only in PAL?
Overall I liked this film, though many of the inaccuracies annoyed me - Anne questioning witnesses? Henry visiting her in the Tower? PUR-LEASE!
A glaring omission here is the fact that ANNE OF THE THOUSAND DAYS won the Oscar for Best Costume Design that year (1969). Costumer Margaret Furse beat out such formidable competition as Edith Head, Irene Sharaff, Ray Aghayan and Donfeld for the excellence of her designs. A slavish coping of portrait clothing of the period would have been dull indeed, but Miss Furse was clever enough to incorporate the basic silhouette of early 16th century England into gowns that were perfectly cut, tailored and detailed with just the right touches of originality (the French hoods and the parted over skirting are two examples). Not authentic? Who cares when they are so stunning (except for the masculine outfits; there you are correct)? The film also garnered no less than TEN Academy Award Nominations, including Best Picture…even with Oscar politics, that’s no mean feat for ANY film.
One needs also to remember that ANNE OF THE THOUSAND DAYS is based NOT on history as recorded by an historian, but a 1948 PLAY by Maxwell Anderson, with his own interpretation of characters and speeches chosen for best dramatic effect. Most of Anderson’s historic heroines suffer from historical foresight, that is true. But in the case of ANNE OF THE THOUSAND DAYS, her “Elizabeth shall be queen” speech is thrown at Henry as a challenge and in an effort to hurt him and his willingness to kill her to get what he wants. If you read the play and examine the screenplay as written, you’ll find the scene ends with Henry leaving her to her fate and Anne crumbled into tears as she voices the thought, “I wonder what will happen to my little girl when she’s left all alone in the world?” Too bad it was cut from the final version. The subtlety of the characterization is easily lost.
It is also recorded that Anne constantly was glancing behind her at the execution, not only hoping for a last minute pardon, but also wondering when the blow would be struck. That would only be natural. When I first saw this film in March of 1970, most of the audience left either crying or in silent contemplation. The world has changed since then. Perhaps I’m too old now to see anything humorous in the decapitation of an innocent woman in a film. In the recent “light” of THE OTHER BOLEYN GIRL or THE TUDORS, ANNE OF THE THOUSAND DAYS stands taller than ever. IMHO. Patrick Boleyn, no relation.
faye-
Yes...I think that's just the Region 2 version. I should have clarified.
So far the only NTSC version (that I know of) is the combo-pack.
Patrick-
Unfortunately period films almost ALWAYS take home the Oscar for best costume, whether they are well designed or not (this is a constant sore point for costume designers in the film industry).
I don't put much stock in Oscar wins or nominations. "All About Eve" garnered 6 nominations (compared to Anne's 10) but is a far superior film in my opinion. 'The Godfather' only had 3... Many very good films receive none.
I stand by my statement that Anne's costumes are beautiful (no one is saying they aren't).
But overall I don't think the costumes as a whole worked well in a purely design sense, nor were they historically accurate (A question I get often on this site and will always address).
For example...Anne's costumes are always beautiful, but does her wardrobe improve significantly when she begins to gain favour or is crowned Queen? Not really. A good costume designer should have addressed this and used costumes to say something about the characters.
Again I point to 'Henry VIII and his Six Wives' which clearly shows a 'before' and 'after' wardrobe for his wives. The costumes are mostly historically correct, and therefore may be a tadd boring to most theater goers (which could be a stroke against them ) but at least they help to forward the story.
This is less evident in "Anne of the Thousand Days".
As to Anne's execution... it is recorded that Anne glanced behind her (blindfolded) when the executioner called for his sword. However, this was done to get Anne to turn her head into a correct position so he could make a clean strike. As I mention the details of the execution are well documented and I don't know why they chose to deviated from it here.
I still think the stare-down as portrayed in the film is stupid. Not to say that it couldn't have worked (and been tragic) if the executor had just coldly smote off her head when she looked at him...but that damn French accent didn't allow it to be anything but comical, which undermined and belittled an innocent woman's death.
I loved this film and re-watch it often, but that doesn't mean I can't hold filmmakers to account. Like I said, this film is obviously NOT meant to be historically accurate...which is fine, expect that most of the structural and dramatic problems (when they occur) are usually due to the filmmakers/playwrite taking too much dramatic licence with the historical record. In these cases (like the execution example mentioned above) they have clearly gone too far.
Okay...that's it. I'll get off my soapbox now.
I agree with you for the most part, Richard Burton wasn't that great as Henry VIII and some of the scenes do seem pretty fake ( for lack of a better word). But Genevieve Bujold is physically a lot like the real Anne- the dark eyes, olive skin, almond shaped eyes, and thick brown hair. Also the part about the executioner, where he says"she looks at me" is actually close to what happened. The executioner was so taken with Anne that he said "Oh, where is my sword?" so that Anne would think she had another minute to live.
Hi Lauren,
I think you're spot on with you assessment of Richard Burton...but please don't think I disliked Genevieve Bujold, on the contrary, I thought she was especially adept in the role.
(perhaps I should re-word the review, since at a glance I can see how that might be read as 'inept').
However, I would still have to disagree with you about the execution. As I mentioned above to an earlier commenter the Executioner did call for his sword, but this was done out of practicality as well as mercy...since she then turned her head, which was now in the position for a clean strike (which as you rightly point out, she wasn't expecting).
But the only reason that worked is because she was blindfolded....so really I don't think you can draw any significant comparison from that scenario to the one portrayed in the movie.
And even if you could, it's not the fact that she looked at him that bugged me, rather it was that damned silly French accent!
That was not a good line to end on..
I re-watched this film recently, and noticed something else that bothered me about Anne's execution - No speech!
I wonder why they omitted it? Possibly because of the 'historical clairvoyance' speech she gave to Henry?
I actually really like Richard Burton as Henry VIII. At least he was better than Eric Bana in The Other Boleyn Girl, in my opinion.
What a great web site! Just found it through a link. The screencaps are gorgeous and very welcome since I don't know how to do that yet.
~Missy Holland
I have always loved that film. In the genre I think it's a real winner. Of course there are inaccuracies but nothing compare with the television serie "The Tudors" (now that is laughable). As for Burton and Bujold - they outshine recent portrayals (Rhys-Meyer, Bana, Dormer, Portman) by a good margin, incidently I find Bujold ideal in the role of Anne.
I notice that there are a couple other inaccuracies in the movie that are not mentioned. At the end of Katherine's life, the movie has her daughter Mary at her side. This did not happen, she was seperated from her daughter long before that and did not see her again before her death. Also, during the final scenes before Anne makes her way to the scaffold we are shown a coffin being carried in. She also glaces at it on her way up. There was no coffin provided by Henry, there was an oversight and an arrow chest had to be used for the body.
You are completely right Jen, in your response to Patrick...just because a film does well at the Oscars doesn't necessarily mean it was great for the right reasons. The film industry is a supply and demand sytem,,,if the costumes look pretty then GREAT! AND YOU ARE CORRECT ABOUT THE EXECUTION SCENE! Calling out for his sword was a way of distracting Anne in order for her to glance forwards, averting her gaze from the executioner enabling him to sever her head quickly and cleanly....end of! Yes, the comic accent was annoying and the absence of the famous speech, DITTO! Don't get me started on Henry turning up at the Tower and the "Elizabeth will be Queen" stuff.
Post a Comment